"While the cross-stock mean buy-and-hold return is over 30,000%, the median is -6.9%. Shareholders' wealth was enhanced by $91 trillion over the century, but long-term investors in nearly 60% of stocks incurred wealth reductions"
The officials say it could have been created to redistribute the pyramid's
weight around the entrance or another as yet undiscovered chamber.
From TFA:
Specialists have linked the corridor to the pyramid’s internal load
management. Its position near the entrance and behind the gabled stonework
suggests it may have helped redirect the immense weight pressing down from
above, much as the relieving chambers over the king’s chamber were designed
to protect spaces below.
Yeah, looks like a "relieving chamber" [0] to me. It'd be interesting to take the densities from muon tomography and plug them into finite element analysis. A recent paper using the muon tomography data to inform comparisons of ramp styles [1] says that further data is needed:
The possibility that the NFC functioned as a relieving chamber has been
previously suggested, though without consensus. . . . where the NFC’s gabled
vault—an architecture well known for load redirection—could act as a
stress-moderating feature, limiting transmission toward the Descending
Passage. This interpretation remains hypothetical and does not imply
intentional design integration; it is based solely on geometric compatibility
and structural plausibility. Verifying a load-management role will require
dedicated finite-element analyses constrained by ERT geometry and improved
characterization of internal stratigraphy.
Yes, but HN is dominated by the latter aggressively irrational folks. Look at how many of kindkang2024's comments with perfectly reasonable content are dead--the nuttiness has infiltrated mod policy.
Thanks for the clarification. I did see some things in your comments (for example giving references in the one above) that made me suspect this.
I dislike the character imparted to your words by the LLM, though. Knowing that it is artificial makes me feel it's more of a waste of time to read it. But I will try to ignore it.
I don't think it's entirely due to US politics. The strength of the dollar against the pound, the perception of the US as not being a fashionable place to go, the fact that most news about the US in the UK media is either war, Epstein, or ICE, measured against some very competitive offers for other destinations that don't have those problems, makes me believe it's certainly a high percentage. FWIW in my teams (approx. 100 people, all in the UK) I can only think of one person who travelled to the US in the last year, and that was a trip to Disney they'd had booked in for a while. The rest have all been going to southern Europe, Japan etc.
> However, you can save 1 byte of RAM by using the branch instructions instead, as long as you know which flag(s), if any, are guaranteed to be on or off at the jump point.
> For example, if you know the carry flag will always be clear at the jump point, and if the jump distance is within branching range, you can replace JMP with BCC.
However if the BCC crosses a page boundary it'll take 4 cycles, one cycle longer than a JMP.
reply