Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | CommanderHux's commentslogin

Subaru's eyesight uses cameras


Sorry. I meant cameras only. As far as I’m aware every system on the market uses cameras for lanes and radar for obstacles ahead except Tesla since they removed their radar.

I’m guessing (but didn’t check!) Subaru also has the radar too.


Subarus only use cameras.


Interesting. Thanks. Personally I’d rather have the radar + camera. I see it as more reliable.

Doesn’t help in this situation though.


Need to understand the modular nature of cars. The radar is one system and camera is another. Camera is only used for lane detection the only output from the camera is if road lines are detected and how close to either line. Based on this the car can “ping pong” since it detects it getting too close to one line, or if it has two cameras it can determine what the center of the lane is by keeping the distance from each line equal.

Radar typically applies to the ACC system while camera applies to LKAS or lane centering. Rarely are the two connected. FSD and comma.ai are probably the only systems which combine the two.


> Camera is only used for lane detection […]

That might be true for some vehicles only.

Subaru EyeSight cameras (there are 2x front cameras and 1x rear camera) are also used to detect moving and stationary objects, and it will engage the emergency braking if, e.g., you are driving or reversing into a wall. Lane detection can be disabled on Subaru cars, yet the EyeSight will continue to scan surroundings and be ready to start breaking.

As of this year, the EyeSight is available even on Subaru BRZ 2nd gen with the manual transmisson.


> ... Subaru BRZ 2nd gen with the manual transmisson.

How does it manage that? Is the clutch electrically controlled?


It is just emergency braking (electronic brake distribution across all wheels according to sensor readings), plus ABS in a hard braking scenario. The clutch is not affected.


So the car brakes, but you have to press the clutch?


You don’t have to, the car will stall out. Another scenario: you are in 5th gear and the cruise control slows down to 15mph. The car stalls. My manual did that 25 years ago


Frankly, I do not know – mine is the '23 model, not the '24 one.

According to this video, breaks will be applied automatically, even if it is in neutral or if the engine stalls: https://youtu.be/8WIydvZZ23I


Right that’s how I’m used to them all working.


The Bluecruise setup in the article also uses cameras as well as radar.


The dataset link seems to be dead. Do you have a mirror?


Edit: Updated!

https://mega.nz/folder/A1BjnSYQ#NQe5qhYLVBqiRwhWRmcVtg

Article is updating too.


Thanks. Is Dedup supported on SQL COPY too?


Not for CSV import via SQL COPY sadly


For which workload?


Which state disallows that specifically?


I don't believe any state specifically disallows traps and monsters. They just say how you're allowed to dispose of a body, not all the ways you can't. In other words, it's not an Air Bud situation. Anyway, just a joke, I don't have enough kobolds to populate a dungeon with (yet).


I don't think this is just a joke, it's a gross overstep by liberal governments. We should rally together as conservatives and libertarians to ensure that we get the burial that we deserve - big government has to go.


Most states disallow traps - they're indiscriminate devices that could harm people with legitimate reasons to go on your property, e.g. emergency workers.


what are they gonna do, arrest me?


They can summon your spirit and bind it to a prison cell (assuming you'll build a pyramid with traps).


They could arrest whoever owns that land.


they'd have to navigate the dungeon first. if they do that, then I guess me being arrested is their prize


They're too late by definition: the dead have no need for emergency services.


Their fault for sending the clerics in before the rogue.


There are no legitimate reasons to go on my property.


Nonsense. Property ownership is not absolute.

If the police can convince a judge that there is probably cause to believe that a crime is being committed on your property and to give them a warrant, that would be a legitimate reason to go to your property.


Surprised it took this long for S3 to enable this by default.

Azure Storage did it back in October, 2017 for new objects and retroactively applied it for existing objects too as a background process.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/common/stora...

Google Cloud storage also has it available by default, but not sure if this was always the case.

https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/encryption


It seems Google Cloud Storage introduced it in August 2013[1], enabled by default.

[1]: https://cloudplatform.googleblog.com/2013/08/google-cloud-st...


Am I missing something or does there seem to be data mismatch?

Breakdown of Salaries by Geography -> NYC Area -> Highest Salary 300K

Breakdown of Salaries by Funding Level* -> $5M-$9.9M -> Highest Salary 400K for NYC


Azure had it from the beginning


Azure doesn't let you write more than 20MB/s to an storage account.


What are you talking about? The default ingress rate is 10 Gbps: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/common/scalab...

Elsewhere they state maximum scalability targets of 400 Gbps egress and 80 Gbps ingress: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/files/storage...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: