> I wonder if this is the endgame of social mobility as more and more humans become replaced through automation: a competition for the attention of those at the top.
I think in general, the creative industry has always been one that fascinates people, that's its purpose in the end. This naturally motivates people to want to work in it, creating a large supply for a small demand of jobs. As a result, entering the industry is extremely difficult. It doesn't end at getting the job though, people in the creative industry are often extremely overworked.
On your other point, I agree that with the increase of AI there will be very negative impacts on social mobility:
* human labour will be increasingly worthless as robots get cheaper and more capable. It will only survive in a few niches where it gives sentimental value (humans are the new horses, cgp grey had a great video about this). so both skill and hard work won't be valued as much any more as they are valued right now.
* AI also gives better tools to the rich to protect their assets. With increased AI, there is less people required for society to function any more. The poor aren't driving the trains any more, nor are they shooting the guns, or running the steel mills. They can turn these tools less and less against the property owning class if they feel sufficiently dissatisfied.
* AI creates tremendous wealth and it's easy to make the poor feel wealthier just by giving them some of the crumbles, while giving 99% of the new wealth to the top 0.1%. Revolutions happen when people are hungry. When you satisfy their basic needs, then people care less about these issues. Yes, in the future, the bottom 99% might even be happy, but they might have increasingly small chunks of the new wealth.
Sorry, but AI wealth creation is based on mass theft of intellectual property created by others. The only risk is getting caught and that's taken care of my clever marketing.
I think in general, the creative industry has always been one that fascinates people, that's its purpose in the end. This naturally motivates people to want to work in it, creating a large supply for a small demand of jobs. As a result, entering the industry is extremely difficult. It doesn't end at getting the job though, people in the creative industry are often extremely overworked.
On your other point, I agree that with the increase of AI there will be very negative impacts on social mobility:
* human labour will be increasingly worthless as robots get cheaper and more capable. It will only survive in a few niches where it gives sentimental value (humans are the new horses, cgp grey had a great video about this). so both skill and hard work won't be valued as much any more as they are valued right now.
* AI also gives better tools to the rich to protect their assets. With increased AI, there is less people required for society to function any more. The poor aren't driving the trains any more, nor are they shooting the guns, or running the steel mills. They can turn these tools less and less against the property owning class if they feel sufficiently dissatisfied.
* AI creates tremendous wealth and it's easy to make the poor feel wealthier just by giving them some of the crumbles, while giving 99% of the new wealth to the top 0.1%. Revolutions happen when people are hungry. When you satisfy their basic needs, then people care less about these issues. Yes, in the future, the bottom 99% might even be happy, but they might have increasingly small chunks of the new wealth.